The Nathaniel Hawthorne Review invites submissions for a special issue on Hawthorne and Religion, with guest editor Jonathan A. Cook. Over the course of his career, Hawthorne earned a reputation as the nation’s leading imaginative interpreter of New England Puritanism and its nineteenth-century cultural legacy, but the exact nature of his religious predilections remains open to debate. Was he a bona fide Christian? If he was, why didn’t he go to church? What credence did Hawthorne give to his ancestral Calvinism? What impact did his wife’s Unitarianism have on him? Did Hawthorne have a well-kept “secret” that influenced his depiction of repressed guilt? What did Hawthorne think of contemporary evangelical Protestantism, and of the nation’s increasingly varied religious denominations? What does Hawthorne’s fiction say about his attitude to Unitarianism, Congregationalism, Catholicism, Quakers, and Shakers? How do Hawthorne’s journals, sketches, stories, and novels chronicle the religious currents of his era? Other general areas of exploration include Hawthorne and the Bible, Hawthorne and Milton, Hawthorne and the demonic, Hawthorne and the history and doctrines of New England Puritanism, Hawthorne’s religious psychology, and Hawthorne and Christian myth (notably Creation, Fall, and Apocalypse). Subject matter and critical approaches are open. Those interested should send a 250-word abstract to jcookinscrutable@gmail.com by October 1, 2021.
Nathaniel Hawthorne Society Call for Papers: MLA 2022
The annual conference of the Modern Language Association will be held in Washington, DC on Jan. 6-9, 2022. The Nathaniel Hawthorne Society seeks proposals for the following panel:Hawthorne at Play
We invite papers that consider “play” and “at play” in the most capacious sense, welcoming historical, formal, and theoretical readings of “Hawthorne at Play.” These might include the play of language in Hawthorne’s work (the pleasure of the text, jouissance, textual desire); intertextual play and play with precursors and historical sources; play with generic and readerly expectations; or representations and figures of play in Hawthorne’s writings and relevant historical contexts. Papers might also engage various theories of play, affect, and aesthetics to illuminate Hawthorne’s work. Might, for example, Sianne Ngai’s “aesthetic categories” of the zany, the cute, and the interesting apply to Hawthorne’s work?
Please submit abstracts of approximately 250 words to Nancy Sweet nsweet@csus.edu by March 8, 2021.
Ralph Waldo Emerson Society call-for-blog
The Ralph Waldo Emerson Society announces The Transparent Eyeball, a blog devoted to a collaborative study of Emerson and the innumerable circles of conversation in which he participated and in which we continue to find him. We welcome short—500-1,000 word—submissions from undergraduate and graduate students, teachers, independent scholars, early career as well as established scholars, artists, activists, and the general public. We especially encourage submissions that address Emerson’s relevance in our 21st-century moment; consider him in conversation with philosophers, poets, environmentalists, artists, and activists, within and beyond the nineteenth century; and explore him in transnational and interdisciplinary contexts. Submissions may take any form—meditations, provocations, polemics, analyses, critical-creative hybrids, personal reflections—but should be original work, jargon-free, and accessible to the general public. Submissions will be received on a rolling basis and reviewed by members of the Ralph Waldo Emerson Society Media Committee. Submissions may be returned to applicants with suggested revisions. Please submit your Transparent Eyeball contributions to TheTransparentEyeballBlog@gmail.com
Call for Papers: Pandemics 101: Hawthorne’s Advice for Prevention and Survival,
Special Issue of the Nathaniel Hawthorne Review
Recently, in April, 2020, Ron Fein, in the midst of the current pandemic, published a satirical essay (in McSweeney’s.net), taking on the persona of Thoreau and in that voice critiquing faculty for teaching him improperly, not giving him enough respect, and for not taking his advice about the benefits of self-reliance, simplicity, and solitude seriously. Although a jocular piece, Fein’s work reminds us that the pandemic has brought to the fore some of the issues that the Transcendentalists took on in earnest as they considered questions of responsibility and the role and importance of solitude and reflection in human life. Although Hawthorne was clearly not a Transcendentalist, he does share some of his fellow Concord inhabitants’ (and other American Romantics’) ideas and feelings. We find ourselves wondering what advice Hawthorne might have had for us during these difficult times.
In this CFP for a special issue of the Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, we are looking for a scholarly analysis of writings by Hawthorne (including his journals and correspondence) that deal with many issues that have come up during the pandemic. Please submit proposals of 250-500 words by Sept. 30,2020; completed essays of 6,000-6,500 words will be due by March 2, 2021. Send to the editor of the Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, Monika Elbert, Prof. of English, Montclair State University: elbertm@montclair.edu
Essay topics might include:
1) Being alone and liking it: Hawthorne’s (and his characters’) deep regard for solitude and mindfulness;
- a) Perhaps a comparison piece between Hawthorne and Thoreau and the positive value of silence and solitude. Possible comparison between Hawthorne’s “The Artist of the Beautiful” and Thoreau’s Living deliberately, living frugally, living with imagination.
- b) Or Hester’s self-reliance and resounding silence compared with Thoreau’s at Walden Pond. They have much to teach about the positive value of isolation, as it relates to our current need for self-isolation.
- c) Or, bad, fearful solitude (Coverdale’s in a treehouse and in his Boston apartment) vs. positive solitude (going only so far into the community, as in Hester’s case). And Roderick Ellston’s negative seclusion (in ”Egotism; or, the Bosom Serpent”) leading to the serpent growing within his chest.
2) It’s not nice to mess with Mother Nature/What can go wrong in a laboratory situation?–
Hawthorne’s mad scientists working in a laboratory, messing with mother nature, with the unfortunate upshot of death in stories such as “Rappaccini’s Daughter” and “The Birth-mark”; mixing up scientific fact with superstition or fantasy (basis of science fiction?).
Or a variant thereof: re: our relationship to nature: the incursion of the unnatural into the natural realm, and the industrial into the environmental; the idea of our rapacious, improper relationship to the environment because of the zoonotic aspect of COVID when we intruded into habitats. Compare the laboratory stories by Hawthorne with Thoreau’s condemnation of the train’s appearance in the bucolic Concord landscape, or his condemnation of the loggers industrializing the Maine Woods. Dominating our landscape instead of finding our place within it.
3) Pandemic/contagion fears—comparison of smallpox epidemic in Hawthorne’s “Lady Eleanore’s Mantle” and Poe’s “The Masque of the Red Death,” and the arrogance of the wealthy
4) Catastrophic Thinking: Thoughts of the apocalypse and fearing God’s wrath—Hawthorne’s stories about the Millerites (“The Hall of Fantasy,” “Earth’s Holocaust,” “The New and Eve,” “The Christmas Banquet”)
5) Don’t eat raw animals (don’t eat a woodchuck raw), and eat in moderation to avoid weight gain—
Thoreau’s diet of moderation in Walden (as he suppresses a desire to eat a woodchuck raw), compared with unhealthy eating and drinking in various Hawthorne texts, among them Coverdale’s excessive food episodes in the saloon episodes of Blithedale—those pictures on the wall of sirloin, deer, salmon, ducks, and various “pictorial viand” and the excessive description of various cocktails;
Or stress and over-eating: Dimmesdale stuffing his face after his final encounter with Hester in the forest, when he returns home and realizes he has to rewrite the election sermon for the Governor’s installation the next day.
Thoreau’s and Hawthorne’s healthy vision of gardening and savoring of food (in Walden and in the “Old Manse” preface).
6) Wearing a mask and maybe liking it (making a statement), or Masks as survival—
What a difference a mask or emblem makes: “The Minister’s Black Veil,” Hester’s scarlet letter as badge of honor (and as a shield to fend off Indian arrows), the Veiled Lady’s veiled appearance in Blithedale
7) Fears of medicine, fears of vaccinations, fear of magical potions, fears of unproven science—Hawthorne’s “The Elixir of Life,” “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” and Septimius Felton, “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment”
8) News stories: Fake news/rumors vs. real/authoritative news. Hawthorne’s “Old News” and “Mr. Higginbotham’s Catastrophe”; Thoreau’s contempt for fake news in Walden and in “Slavery in Massachusetts”; Official information—who controls news?
9) Home-schooling as superior (as, in Hester’s education of Pearl in nature vs. the education of intolerant Puritan children ); compare Emerson’s idea of self-education in “The American Scholar” and “Self-Reliance”
10) Redefining or reconceptualizing our notion of work. Losing job fears—creativity stemming from job loss, as in Hawthorne’s “Custom-House” description; compare to Emerson’s view of work in “The Transcendentalist”
11) How do long hours of solitude lead to revolutionary action? How Hester becomes a feminist, revolutionary thinker in her remote peninsula cottage, and how Thoreau finds his political voice at Walden Pond?
Nathaniel Hawthorne Society Call-for-Papers
The American Literature Association’s Annual Conference will meet at the Manchester Grand Hyatt in San Diego, CA on May 21-24, 2020. The Nathaniel Hawthorne Society is issuing two CFPs for the conference:
1) Hawthorne and Neo-Aesthetics
The editors of Aesthetics in a Multicultural Age wonder what aesthetics would look like in a world that no longer “assumes that there are universal standards of beauty” (3). This panel, therefore, seeks papers that reconsider Hawthorne’s work from a post- or neo-aesthetic perspective, including fresh ways to interrogate how judgment, heuristics, and standards of beauty function within his body of work. Short stories, longer works (such as The Blithedale Romance or The Marble Faun), and non-fiction (including the European notebooks) are all welcome.
2) Hawthorne and Fatherhood
We invite proposals for papers exploring aspects of “Hawthorne and Fatherhood.” This may include, but is not limited to: Hawthorne as father; Julian’s and Rose’s memories of their father; missing fathers (as in Hawthorne’s own); father stand-ins, such as grandfather in Grandfather’s Chair; Dimmesdale as deadbeat father or Chillingworth as want-to-be father, leaving his money to Pearl; Coverdale and Hollingsworth avoiding fatherhood, though the latter wants to be some great paternal figure; barren men and husbands, as in House of Seven Gables; or other fathers in Hawthorne’s shorter fiction.
Please submit abstracts of approximately 250 words to Nancy Sweet nsweet@csus.edu by January 11, 2020.
The Nathaniel Hawthorne Society 